{"id":49468,"date":"2026-05-11T15:30:07","date_gmt":"2026-05-11T12:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/2026\/05\/11\/kongre-iptali-davasi-mahkemeden-saadet-partisi-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-05-11T15:30:08","modified_gmt":"2026-05-11T12:30:08","slug":"kongre-iptali-davasi-mahkemeden-saadet-partisi-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/2026\/05\/11\/kongre-iptali-davasi-mahkemeden-saadet-partisi-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Kongre iptali davas\u0131! Mahkemeden Saadet Partisi karar\u0131!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Saadet Partisi&#8217;nin 24 Kas\u0131m 2024&#8217;te ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen 9. B\u00fcy\u00fck Kongresi&#8217;nin iptaline ili\u015fkin dava reddedildi.Ankara 37. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;ndeki duru\u015fmaya, Saadet Partisi&#8217;nin avukatlar\u0131 Ahmet Yaz\u0131c\u0131, Hasan Tahsin \u00d6za\u015far ile davac\u0131lar eski Van \u0130l Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mehmet Necip Yavuzer ve \u00d6zay Dilber ile avukat\u0131 Kamil Nadir Sar\u0131lkan kat\u0131ld\u0131.Duru\u015fmay\u0131, baz\u0131 Saadet Partisi \u00fcyeleri de takip etti.Hakim, dava dosyas\u0131na gelen evrak\u0131 okuduktan sonra avukatlara s\u00f6z verdi.Avukat Sar\u0131lkan, bilirki\u015finin verilen g\u00f6rev kapsam\u0131nda raporunu sunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek, a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davan\u0131n \u00fcye hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu bu sebeple davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesini talep etti.Saadet Partisi avukat\u0131 \u00d6za\u015far, davan\u0131n usulden reddedilmesi gerekti\u011fini belirterek, \u015fu beyanda bulundu:&#8221;Davac\u0131lar\u0131n temel tezi baz\u0131 il kongrelerinin vaktinde yap\u0131lmamas\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130ddia edildi\u011fi gibi yokluk s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Siyasi Partiler Kanunu&#8217;na g\u00f6re eski delegelerin se\u00e7imi yap\u0131labilir. Dava s\u00fcbjektif \u00e7\u0131karla a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.&#8221;Saadet Partisi avukat\u0131 Yaz\u0131c\u0131 da davac\u0131lar\u0131n delege itiraz\u0131na ili\u015fkin hususun Siyasi Partiler Kanunu&#8217;na g\u00f6re dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek, &#8220;Bu dava siyasi niyetle a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep ediyoruz.&#8221; dedi.Beyanlar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan karar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan mahkeme, Saadet Partisi&#8217;nin 24 Kas\u0131m 2024&#8217;te ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen 9. B\u00fcy\u00fck Kongresi&#8217;nin iptaline ili\u015fkin davan\u0131n reddine h\u00fckmetti.&#8217;OLAYIN GE\u00c7M\u0130\u015e\u0130&#8217;Davay\u0131, Saadet Partisi\u2019nin eski Van \u0130l Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mehmet Necip Yavuzer ile beraberindeki isimlerin a\u00e7t\u0131. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, aralar\u0131nda Ankara, \u0130stanbul, \u0130zmir, Konya ve Gaziantep\u2019in de bulundu\u011fu \u00e7ok say\u0131da il ve il\u00e7ede kongrelerin yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc.Davac\u0131lar, bu nedenle kongrede oy kullanan bin 26 delegeden 789\u2019unun delege niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, kongrenin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini iddia etti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Saadet Partisi&#8217;nin 24 Kas\u0131m 2024&#8217;te ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen 9. B\u00fcy\u00fck Kongresi&#8217;nin iptaline ili\u015fkin dava reddedildi.Ankara 37. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;ndeki duru\u015fmaya, Saadet Partisi&#8217;nin avukatlar\u0131 Ahmet Yaz\u0131c\u0131, Hasan Tahsin \u00d6za\u015far ile davac\u0131lar eski Van \u0130l Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mehmet Necip Yavuzer ve \u00d6zay Dilber ile avukat\u0131 Kamil Nadir Sar\u0131lkan kat\u0131ld\u0131.Duru\u015fmay\u0131, baz\u0131 Saadet Partisi \u00fcyeleri de takip etti.Hakim, dava dosyas\u0131na gelen evrak\u0131 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":49469,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[120,680,116],"class_list":["post-49468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politika","tag-mahkeme","tag-saadet-partisi","tag-siyaset-haberleri"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49468"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49468\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49470,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49468\/revisions\/49470"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}