CHP’nin 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131 ve 21. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay\u0131’n\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin davaya dair ba\u015fvurular ve tepkiler s\u00fcr\u00fcyor.\u00a0Davan\u0131n reddedilmesi, Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’nun yan\u0131nda yer alanlar\u0131 memnun etmedi.\u00a0“\u015eaibe”\u00a0iddialar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcndemden d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi kurultaya ili\u015fkin, bu kez \u0130stinaf’a ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131.\u00a0Eski Hatay B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f’\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu \u00f6nceki CHP kurultay delegeleri, Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, CHP’nin 4-5 Kas\u0131m 2023’te yap\u0131lan 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’n\u0131n iptali davas\u0131nda verdi\u011fi davan\u0131n\u00a0“konusuz kalmas\u0131”\u00a0sebebiyle\u00a0“karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na” dair karar\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvurdu.”HUKUKEN VARLIK KAZANMASI M\u00dcMK\u00dcN DE\u011e\u0130L”L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f ve delegelerin avukat\u0131 Onur Yusuf \u00dcregen’in, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi’ne sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7ede, Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin as\u0131l dava y\u00f6n\u00fcnden\u00a0“konusuz kalma”\u00a0nedeniyle\u00a0“karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na”,\u00a0birle\u015fen dosyalar\u0131ndaki davalar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise aktif dava ehliyeti yoklu\u011fundan karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti\u011fi hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.Dilek\u00e7ede, 4-5 Kas\u0131m 2023 tarihli 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay’\u0131n yap\u0131l\u0131\u015f \u015fekli ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclerek,\u00a0“Kurultay mutlak butlanla sakatlanm\u0131\u015f olup, bu kurultay sonucunda se\u00e7ildi\u011fi iddia edilen genel ba\u015fkan ve y\u00f6netim organlar\u0131n\u0131n hukuken varl\u0131k kazanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.”\u00a0ifadelerine yer verildi.Mahkemenin davay\u0131 “konusuz kalma”\u00a0gerek\u00e7esinin hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunulan dilek\u00e7ede, davan\u0131n konusuz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortada hukuken hi\u00e7 do\u011fmam\u0131\u015f bir y\u00f6netim eliyle tesis edilmi\u015f yok h\u00fckm\u00fcndeki i\u015flemlerin iptalini gerektiren bir hukuki tablo oldu\u011fu belirtildi.”S\u0130STEMAT\u0130K FESAT”Bu fiillerin, parti i\u00e7i demokratik iradeyi ve se\u00e7imin d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck ilkesini ortadan kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunulan dilek\u00e7ede, “38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u2019\u0131n ilk turunda yaln\u0131zca 18 oy farkla \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel lehine sonu\u00e7 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, delege iradesine y\u00f6nelik bu sistematik fesad\u0131n etkisini somut bi\u00e7imde g\u00f6stermektedir.Ayr\u0131ca, iradeleri sakatland\u0131\u011f\u0131 sabit hale gelen 196 \u0130stanbul delegesinin Kurultay’da oy kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n me\u015fruiyeti tamamen ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”\u00a0de\u011ferlendirmesine yer verildi.”BU KURULTAYDA ALINAN KARARLAR HUKUKA AYKIRI”Mevcut y\u00f6netimin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararlarla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen 6 Nisan 2025 ve 21 Eyl\u00fcl 2025’teki ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultaylar\u0131n hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu savunulan dilek\u00e7ede, bu kurultaylar\u0131n\u00a0“bizzat mahkemeyi yan\u0131ltma saikiyle ve yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 etkisiz k\u0131lma amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve hukuka kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k bir hile te\u015fkil etti\u011fi”\u00a0vurguland\u0131.Dilek\u00e7ede, \u015fu ifadeler yer ald\u0131:” \u00d6zellikle 4-5 Kas\u0131m 2023 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen 38. Kurultaydaki butlan, sonradan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen hi\u00e7bir i\u015flemle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lamaz, zira yok h\u00fckm\u00fcndeki bir i\u015flemin, sonradan do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 bi\u00e7imde me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.Nitekim yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlarda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere bir i\u015flemin mutlak butlanla sakat olmas\u0131, onun hukuk aleminde hi\u00e7bir sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmamas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir, sonradan yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler bu sakatl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmaz.38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay’da ya\u015fanan ak\u00e7eli ili\u015fkiler, irade fesad\u0131 halleri ve bu kapsamda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden fiiller sonucunda se\u00e7ilen \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel ve y\u00f6netimi, yaln\u0131zca yetkisiz de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda hukuken yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde bir olu\u015fumdur.Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bu y\u00f6netim taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay kararlar\u0131 ile bu kurultayda al\u0131nan kararlar\u0131n tamam\u0131 da hukuka a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r ve h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczd\u00fcr.””DELEGELERE M\u0130LYON DOLARLIK R\u00dc\u015eVETLER VER\u0130LD\u0130”Dilek\u00e7ede, davac\u0131lar\u0131n aktif dava ehliyetine sahip olmad\u0131klar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki de\u011ferlendirmenin de temelsiz oldu\u011fu, dernekler hukukunun ve parti i\u00e7i yarg\u0131laman\u0131n temel ilkeleri uyar\u0131nca, \u00fcyelik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn sonradan ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 veya hukuksuz ihra\u00e7 i\u015flemleriyle dava ehliyetinin bertaraf edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunuldu.Mahkemenin, \u00fcyelikleri hukuksuz bi\u00e7imde sona erdirilmi\u015f ki\u015filerin aktif dava ehliyetini yitirdikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn hukuken temelsiz oldu\u011fu \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen dilek\u00e7ede,\u00a0“Dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki belgeler, s\u00f6z konusu kurultayda delegelerin iradelerini fesada u\u011fratmak amac\u0131yla y\u00fczlerce delegeye kayna\u011f\u0131 belli olmayan milyonlarca dolarl\u0131k r\u00fc\u015fvetler verildi\u011fini, baz\u0131 delegelere telefonlar ve tabletler da\u011f\u0131t\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir k\u0131s\u0131m delegelere ise konut temin edilerek iradelerinin y\u00f6nlendirildi\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r.”\u00a0ifadeleri kullan\u0131ld\u0131.Dilek\u00e7ede, CHP y\u00f6netimi taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flenen bu fiillerin parti i\u00e7i demokratik iradeyi sakatlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 se\u00e7imin d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck ve e\u015fitlik ilkelerini tamamen ortadan kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi.KEMAL KILI\u00c7DARO\u011eLU DETAYIAnkara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin karar\u0131n\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131larak, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince esastan incelenerek yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 talep edilen dilek\u00e7ede, 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay’\u0131n mutlak butlanla bat\u0131l oldu\u011funun tespitiyle Genel Ba\u015fkan \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel, Merkez Y\u00f6netim Kurulu (MYK), Parti Meclisi (PM) ve Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu (YDK) \u00fcyelerinin g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 ve 38. Kurultay \u00f6ncesi g\u00f6revde bulunan Genel Ba\u015fkan Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu ile \u00f6nceki kurullar\u0131n g\u00f6reve iadeleri talep edildi.Ayr\u0131ca, 06 Nisan 2025 ve 21 Eyl\u00fcl 2025’te yap\u0131lan ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultaylar\u0131n yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu tespiti edilerek iptal edilmesi ve mevcut y\u00f6netim taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen t\u00fcm mahalle, il\u00e7e ve il kongreleri ile devam eden 39. Ola\u011fan Kurultay s\u00fcrecinde yap\u0131lan t\u00fcm se\u00e7imlerin iptali istendi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
CHP’nin 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131 ve 21. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay\u0131’n\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin davaya dair ba\u015fvurular ve tepkiler s\u00fcr\u00fcyor.\u00a0Davan\u0131n reddedilmesi, Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’nun yan\u0131nda yer alanlar\u0131 memnun etmedi.\u00a0“\u015eaibe”\u00a0iddialar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcndemden d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi kurultaya ili\u015fkin, bu kez \u0130stinaf’a ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131.\u00a0Eski Hatay B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f’\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu \u00f6nceki CHP kurultay delegeleri, Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, CHP’nin 4-5 Kas\u0131m 2023’te […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":15142,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[119,123,124,116],"class_list":["post-15141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politika","tag-chp","tag-kemal-kilidaroglu","tag-kurultay","tag-siyaset-haberleri"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15141"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15141\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15143,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15141\/revisions\/15143"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15142"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}