Son dakika haberleri…\u00a0CHP’nin 38’inci Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’n\u0131n iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan ve 24 Ekim’de reddedilen karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131. Gerek\u00e7ede, davac\u0131lar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n partiden ihra\u00e7 edildikleri i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7ma ehliyetlerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca CHP\u2019nin Y\u00fcksek Se\u00e7im Kurulu denetiminde yeni kurultay ve kongreler d\u00fczenlemesi nedeniyle davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. Mahkeme, kurultayda baz\u0131 delegelere menfaat sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin de ‘Oy kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 pazarl\u0131k yapan delegenin iradesi fesada u\u011fram\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmaz’ tespitine yer verdi.Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, CHP’nin 38\u2019inci Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’ndaki usuls\u00fczl\u00fck iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131rken, eski Hatay B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f ve baz\u0131 delegeler kurultay\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7t\u0131. A\u00e7\u0131lan dosyalar Ankara 42’nci Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nde birle\u015ftirildi. 24 Ekim 2025’teki karar duru\u015fmas\u0131nda mahkeme, CHP’nin 38’inci Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’n\u0131n iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f ve Y\u0131lmaz \u00d6zkanat’\u0131n davalar\u0131, dava a\u00e7ma ehliyeti bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Hatip Karaaslan’\u0131n davas\u0131 ise konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedildi.Ankara 42’nci Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, CHP’nin 4-5 Kas\u0131m 2023 tarihlerinde yap\u0131lan 38’inci Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’n\u0131n iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esini a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Mahkeme, gerek\u00e7esinde \u00f6ncelikle T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 83’\u00fcnc\u00fc maddesine at\u0131fta bulunarak, genel kurul kararlar\u0131n\u0131n iptalini yaln\u0131zca toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lma yeterlili\u011fine sahip \u00fcyelerin isteyebilece\u011fini belirtti. Buna g\u00f6re genel kurul \u00fcyesi olmayan veya genel kurula kat\u0131lma hakk\u0131 bulunmayan ki\u015filerin, al\u0131nan kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 mahkemeye ba\u015fvuramayaca\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131.CHP\u2019li Canbolat \u015faibeli kurultay i\u00e7in savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa ifade verdi: H\u0131rs\u0131z\u0131 savunacak halimiz yokSAVA\u015e’IN DAVA A\u00c7MA EHL\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N BULUNMADI\u011eINA H\u00dcKMED\u0130LD\u0130Dosyada birle\u015fen davalardan birinin davac\u0131s\u0131 L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f’\u0131n kurultay delegesi olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, CHP Merkez Y\u00f6netim Kurulu’nun 3 Ekim 2024 tarihli karar\u0131yla kesin ihra\u00e7 istemiyle Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu’na sevk edildi\u011fi, Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu’nun 11 Aral\u0131k 2024 tarihli karar\u0131yla kesin ihra\u00e7 cezas\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. Bu nedenle, partiden ihra\u00e7 edilen Sava\u015f’\u0131n dava a\u00e7ma ehliyetinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi. Birle\u015fen bir di\u011fer dosyada davac\u0131 Y\u0131lmaz \u00d6zkanat’\u0131n da 10 Mart 2025 tarihli MYK karar\u0131yla Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu’na sevk edildi\u011fi ve 14 May\u0131s 2025 tarihli kararla partiden kesin ihra\u00e7 edildi\u011fi tespit edildi. Bu gerek\u00e7eyle, hem L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f’\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 birle\u015fen davan\u0131n hem de Y\u0131lmaz \u00d6zkanat’\u0131n taraf oldu\u011fu dosyan\u0131n aktif husumet ehliyeti yoklu\u011fu nedeniyle reddine karar verildi.’YEN\u0130 SE\u00c7\u0130MLER YAPILDI\u011eI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N DAVALAR KONUSUZ KALDI’Mahkeme, as\u0131l dava ve birle\u015fen dosyalar\u0131n CHP’nin 4-5 Kas\u0131m 2023 tarihli 38’inci Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131, 8 Ekim 2023 tarihli \u0130stanbul \u0130l Kongresi ve 6 Nisan 2025 tarihli 21\u2019inci Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay kararlar\u0131n\u0131n yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde oldu\u011funun tespiti ile iptalini kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlatt\u0131. Ancak daval\u0131 parti taraf\u0131ndan Siyasi Partiler Kanunu uyar\u0131nca Y\u00fcksek Se\u00e7im Kurulu\u2019nun denetiminde yeni kongre ve kurultaylar d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, bu se\u00e7imlerin il\u00e7e se\u00e7im kurullar\u0131nca onayland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n tasdik edildi\u011fi ifade edildi. Bu nedenle, iptali istenen kurultay ve kongrelerin \u00fczerinden yeni se\u00e7imler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in davalar\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi ve ‘Davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na’ h\u00fckmedildi.’\u0130RADELER\u0130N FESADA U\u011eRADI\u011eINDAN S\u00d6Z ED\u0130LEMEZ’Mahkeme, gerek\u00e7esinde ayr\u0131ca irade fesad\u0131 iddialar\u0131n\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirdi. Davac\u0131lar\u0131n, kurultayda baz\u0131 delegelere menfaat temin edilerek oylar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6nlendirildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131. Ancak mahkeme, irade fesad\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun 30-39\u2019uncu maddeleri aras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, bu davada ise \u2018aldatma\u2019 halinin incelenmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtti. Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 2024\/5366, \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n ise 2025\/53885 soru\u015fturma dosyalar\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, baz\u0131 delegelerin menfaat temin ettikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ifadeler bulundu\u011fu ancak bu ifadelerin \u2018delegelerin oy kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda pazarl\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019 anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla iradelerinin fesada u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi kaydedildi.Mahkeme, menfaat temin eden delegelerin ‘ahlaki davranmad\u0131klar\u0131’ \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirilebilece\u011fini ancak bunun kurultay\u0131n iptalini gerektirecek hukuki bir durum olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulad\u0131. \u0130ddialar\u0131n, Siyasi Partiler Kanunu\u2019nun 112\u2019nci maddesi kapsam\u0131nda \u2018Se\u00e7ime hile kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma\u2019 su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi, bu nedenle ilgili ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak delegelerin iradelerinin fesada u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair yeterli kanaat olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi.\u00a0KAYNAK: DHA<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Son dakika haberleri…\u00a0CHP’nin 38’inci Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’n\u0131n iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan ve 24 Ekim’de reddedilen karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131. Gerek\u00e7ede, davac\u0131lar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n partiden ihra\u00e7 edildikleri i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7ma ehliyetlerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca CHP\u2019nin Y\u00fcksek Se\u00e7im Kurulu denetiminde yeni kurultay ve kongreler d\u00fczenlemesi nedeniyle davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. Mahkeme, kurultayda baz\u0131 delegelere menfaat sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin de ‘Oy kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":14943,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[119,124,116],"class_list":["post-14940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politika","tag-chp","tag-kurultay","tag-siyaset-haberleri"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14940"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14940\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14948,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14940\/revisions\/14948"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/daktilock.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}